Skip to main content
Apple

Engadget Reviews Apple Gear, Galaxy S26, Dell XPS 16 and More

Published by
SectorHQ Editorial
Engadget Reviews Apple Gear, Galaxy S26, Dell XPS 16 and More

Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash

That’s the year Apple rolled out a flood of new gear, and Engadget has already reviewed dozens—from the Galaxy S26 to the Dell XPS 16, according to Engadget.

Key Facts

  • Key company: Apple

Engadget’s latest bi‑weekly roundup shows Apple’s 2026 product surge is now anchored by two unusually affordable flagships: the $599 MacBook Neo and the $599 iPhone 17e. Senior reporter Devindra Hardawar praised the Neo as “the best $599 laptop we’ve ever seen,” noting its “premium design, surprisingly bright screen and decent performance” despite the limitation of 8 GB RAM and a single 512 GB SSD, which he says still outpaces any competing Windows notebook in the same price bracket (Engadget). Managing editor Cherlynn Low described the iPhone 17e as a “solid entry‑level handset” that delivers “improved portrait photography, MagSafe, faster wireless charging and the A19 processor,” while conceding that its “outdated display and single‑camera setup” keep it from challenging higher‑end models (Engadget).

Beyond the low‑cost devices, Apple’s mid‑range upgrades continue to rely on its in‑house silicon roadmap. Deputy editor Nathan Ingraham highlighted the M4‑powered iPad Air as “the best Apple tablet overall,” while the company’s MacBook Air now ships with the M5 chip and the MacBook Pro line carries the M5 Pro and M5 Max variants, which Engadget staff rank among the “best choices in their respective categories” (Engadget). The firm also revisited its Studio Display XDR, concluding that the “high price could be worth it for pros who need supreme color accuracy and high brightness,” a niche assessment that underscores Apple’s continued focus on premium professional markets (Engadget).

Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S26, reviewed alongside Apple’s releases, received an 80‑score from Engadget, which called it “a solid if safe addition to the Galaxy series” but criticized its “too similar to last‑generation models” (Engagement). CNET’s David Lumb echoed this sentiment, pointing out that the $900 price tag “doesn’t go toward the right upgrades” and that the phone’s AI tricks, while fun, fail to justify the steeper cost (CNET). The review also noted a larger battery and a more compact form factor as the primary differentiators, but the consensus remains that Samsung has not delivered a compelling enough evolution to sway premium buyers away from Apple’s ecosystem (CNET).

The pricing dynamics between the two flagships illustrate a broader market shift. While Apple’s entry‑level iPhone 17e sits at $599, Samsung’s baseline Galaxy S26 commands $900, a gap highlighted in CNET’s side‑by‑side comparison that also notes the iPhone 17’s $799 price point (CNET). This disparity suggests Apple is leveraging its brand premium to capture budget‑conscious consumers, whereas Samsung is betting on incremental hardware improvements—such as a bigger battery and expanded AI assistant options—to maintain its flagship appeal (Engadget, CNET). Analysts have not yet quantified the impact on market share, but the divergent strategies could influence consumer migration patterns, especially as both firms vie for dominance in the AI‑enhanced smartphone segment.

Dell’s 2026 XPS 16 re‑entered the roundup with a $1,900 price tag and an 80‑score from Engadget, positioning it as a high‑end Windows alternative to Apple’s MacBook line (Engadget). While the review did not delve into performance specifics, the inclusion of the XPS 16 alongside Apple’s low‑cost laptops underscores Dell’s continued commitment to premium hardware for professional users. The broader narrative emerging from Engadget’s recap is that 2026 has become a year of contrast: Apple expands its low‑price offerings to broaden its ecosystem, Samsung refines its flagship formula without radical change, and Dell maintains its niche in the high‑end PC market.

Sources

Primary source

Reporting based on verified sources and public filings. Sector HQ editorial standards require multi-source attribution.

More from SectorHQ:📊Intelligence📝Blog

🏢Companies in This Story

Related Stories