Goldman Sachs vs The New York Times

AI Activity Comparison

Data updated: • Live

Compare Goldman Sachs vs The New York Times with real-time data on AI adoption, activity levels, community sentiment, and marketing honesty. This comparison analyzes 12 recent events including product launches, research papers, GitHub commits, and community discussions to show you which company is genuinely innovating versus just marketing. Our proprietary BS Detection algorithm reveals the gap between hype and reality, measuring how marketing claims align with actual product capabilities and user experiences. Rankings update every 5 minutes with verified data from arXiv, Reddit, tech news, and company blogs.

Quick Answer

Goldman Sachs is significantly better than The New York Times on both activity (12 vs 0 events) and community sentiment (35% vs 30%), making it the stronger and more reliable choice for most users. Goldman Sachs has more honest marketing (BS gap: 5.9 vs 7.8).

Head-to-Head Stats

MetricGoldman SachsThe New York Times
Rank#35#38
Overall Score13628.112039.2
7-Day Events120
30-Day Events190
Sentiment35%30%
Hype Score5.99.4
Reality Score0.01.6
BS Gap+5.9+7.8

Key Insights

Activity Level

Goldman Sachs is 12.0x more active (12 vs 0 events), which means Goldman Sachs is likely releasing more features, updates, and innovations faster than The New York Times.

Community Sentiment

Goldman Sachs has better community sentiment (35% vs 30%), indicating users are more satisfied and have fewer complaints about Goldman Sachs's products.

Marketing Honesty

Goldman Sachs has a lower BS gap (5.9 vs 7.8), meaning Goldman Sachs's marketing claims are more aligned with actual product capabilities and user experiences.

Market Position

Goldman Sachs ranks #35 vs The New York Times at #38, showing Goldman Sachs has stronger overall market presence and adoption.

Want More Details?

View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis