Compare DeepSeek vs The New York Times with real-time data on AI adoption, activity levels, community sentiment, and marketing honesty. This comparison analyzes 14 recent events including product launches, research papers, GitHub commits, and community discussions to show you which company is genuinely innovating versus just marketing. Our proprietary BS Detection algorithm reveals the gap between hype and reality, measuring how marketing claims align with actual product capabilities and user experiences. Rankings update every 5 minutes with verified data from arXiv, Reddit, tech news, and company blogs.
Quick Answer
DeepSeek is significantly better than The New York Times on both activity (14 vs 0 events) and community sentiment (38% vs 31%), making it the stronger and more reliable choice for most users. DeepSeek has more honest marketing (BS gap: 0.7 vs 7.8).
Head-to-Head Stats
| Metric | DeepSeek | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #29 | #45 |
| Overall Score | 23320.6 | 11941.7 |
| 7-Day Events | 14 | 0 |
| 30-Day Events | 21 | 0 |
| Sentiment | 38% | 31% |
| Hype Score | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Reality Score | 8.5 | 1.6 |
| BS Gap | +0.7 | +7.8 |
Key Insights
Activity Level
DeepSeek is 14.0x more active (14 vs 0 events), which means DeepSeek is likely releasing more features, updates, and innovations faster than The New York Times.
Community Sentiment
DeepSeek has better community sentiment (38% vs 31%), indicating users are more satisfied and have fewer complaints about DeepSeek's products.
Marketing Honesty
DeepSeek has a lower BS gap (0.7 vs 7.8), meaning DeepSeek's marketing claims are more aligned with actual product capabilities and user experiences.
Market Position
DeepSeek ranks #29 vs The New York Times at #45, showing DeepSeek has stronger overall market presence and adoption.
Related Comparisons
Compare these companies with other leaders in the AI industry
Want More Details?
View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis