Skip to main content

>CrewAI vs Fast.ai

CrewAI AI Company Profile & RankingsFast.ai AI Company Profile & Rankings

AI Activity Comparison

CrewAI

CrewAI is an open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous AI agents. It enables multiple AI agents, each with specific roles, goals, and tools, to collaborate on complex tasks by breaking them down into sequential steps. The platform is designed to facilitate sophisticated multi-agent collaboration, allowing developers to build applications where agents can work together synergistically. Recent community developments include the creation of specialized agents, such as one designed to sync real-time health data with local supermarket inventory, and the creation of wrappers intended to improve agent reliability and prevent undesirable behavior during task execution. It is currently ranked #74 on an AI industry leaderboard.

Fast.ai

Fast.ai is a non-profit research group focused on deep learning and artificial intelligence, founded in 2016 by Jeremy Howard and Rachel Thomas. Its core mission is to democratize deep learning through education. The organization is best known for providing a free massive open online course (MOOC), 'Practical Deep Learning for Coders,' which requires only a knowledge of Python. The course covers topics including image classification, natural language processing, and various deep learning architectures. In 2018, students from the program won the CIFAR-10 image classification benchmark in Stanford’s DAWNBench competition. The group continues its research and educational efforts to make deep learning more accessible.

Data updated: • Live

Based on 5 events tracked for CrewAI over the past 30 days (2 in the past 7 days), updated in near real-time.

CrewAI versus Fast.ai: Live 2026 Comparison

Based on real-time data, CrewAI outperforms Fast.ai across both activity (2 vs 0 events this week) and community sentiment (60% vs 30%). This comparison draws on 2 tracked events from the past 7 days — including product launches, research papers, and community discussions — scored through our 5-dimension scoring methodology. Our Hype Gap analysis shows CrewAI has more authentic positioning (gap: 0.2) compared to Fast.ai (10.0). Data refreshes every 5 minutes. Compare other AI companies →

Quick Answer

CrewAI is significantly better than Fast.ai on both activity (2 vs 0 events) and community sentiment (60% vs 30%), making it the stronger and more reliable choice for most users. CrewAI has more honest marketing (hype gap: 0.2 vs 10.0).

Head-to-Head Stats

Comparison of key metrics between CrewAI and Fast.ai
MetricCrewAIFast.ai
Rank#106#101
Overall Score10.811.5
7-Day Events20
30-Day Events51
Sentiment60%30%
Momentum
7d vs 30d velocity
0%0%
Hype Score7.710.0
Reality Score7.50.0
Hype Gap+0.2+10.0

📊 Visual Comparison

Compare 5 key metrics on a 0-100 scale. Larger area = stronger overall performance.

CrewAI
Fast.ai
Activity
1vs0
Sentiment
60vs30
Score
11vs12
Momentum
50vs50
Confidence
0vs0

Metric Definitions:

Activity: Weekly GitHub events (max 200 = 100)
Sentiment: Community sentiment (0-100)
Score: Overall ranking score
Momentum: Rank movement trend (50 = neutral)
Confidence: Data confidence level (0-100)

Key Insights

Shipping Velocity

CrewAI logged 2 events this week vs Fast.ai's 0 — a significant difference in product launches, research papers, and code commits. Over the past 30 days, the gap is 5.0x (5 vs 1), suggesting this pace is consistent.

Community Sentiment

CrewAI has 60% positive sentiment vs Fast.ai's 30%. That 30-point gap is significant — it signals stronger user satisfaction and fewer community complaints about CrewAI.

Marketing Honesty

CrewAI's hype gap of 0.2 vs Fast.ai's 10.0 means CrewAI delivers on its promises — marketing claims closely match actual capabilities.

Market Position

Fast.ai at #101 outranks CrewAI at #106 among 2,800+ AI companies. With 5 ranks between them, they compete for similar market segments.

Momentum Trend

Both companies show stable or declining momentum, suggesting a period of consolidation rather than rapid expansion.

Want More Details?

View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis

>

Why Compare CrewAI vs Fast.ai?

Direct Competitors

Fast.ai leads at #101 while CrewAI is closing in at #106. With 5 ranks separating them, they're competing for similar market segments and developer mindshare.

Who Compares These Companies

Tech Decision Makers

Evaluating which platform offers better ROI and developer experience for enterprise adoption.

"Choose Fast.ai for proven scale, or CrewAI for potential agility advantage."

Developers & Builders

Choosing AI tools and platforms based on community sentiment, documentation quality, and ecosystem.

"Consider community feedback and integration ecosystem when making your choice."

Key Differences

  • **Community Perception**: CrewAI has notably stronger positive sentiment (30% higher).

Making Your Decision

Consider CrewAI if you value:

  • • Higher development activity
  • • Stronger community sentiment
  • • Higher substance-to-hype ratio

Consider Fast.ai if you value:

  • • Proven market leadership (#101)
>

How Company Comparisons Work

Our comparison system analyzes real-time data across multiple dimensions to give you an objective, data-driven view of how companies stack up.

1

Real-Time Data Aggregation

We pull live data from 200+ verified sources including GitHub commits, arXiv research papers, product launches, Reddit discussions, and tech news. Data refreshes every 5 minutes.

Activity metrics: Events (7d, 30d, all-time)
Community metrics: Sentiment analysis
Reality metrics: Hype vs substance
Market metrics: Rank, score, movement
2

Apples-to-Apples Scoring

Companies operate at different scales, so we normalize all metrics for fair comparison. Events are scored with time decay (recent events count more) and source diversity multipliers.

5 Dimensions: Innovation, Adoption, Market Impact, Media, Technical
Time Decay: Recent events weighted higher than older ones
Source Diversity: Multiple independent sources weighted higher
3

5-Dimension Scoring

Each event is classified across 5 dimensions, then aggregated with time decay and source diversity weighting.

Score = Σ[(Innovation × 25% + Adoption × 25% + Market Impact × 20% + Media × 15% + Technical × 15%) × Time Decay]
Innovation (25%): Product launches, breakthroughs, novel capabilities
Adoption (25%): User growth, integrations, developer ecosystem
Market Impact (20%): Funding, partnerships, acquisitions
Media Attention (15%): Press coverage, community discussion
Technical (15%): Research papers, benchmarks, open source
Sentiment and Hype/Reality are tracked separately as supplementary signals.
4

Visual Comparison

We present the data in multiple formats to help different decision-making styles:

  • Head-to-Head Table: Direct numeric comparison of all metrics
  • Radar Chart: Visual shape shows strengths and weaknesses
  • Key Insights: AI-generated narrative explaining what the numbers mean
  • Hype Detection: Marketing honesty comparison (over-promise vs over-deliver)
5

Always Current

Unlike static "best of" lists that get stale, our comparisons update every 5 minutes. When a company ships a major release or gets negative sentiment, you'll see it reflected immediately.

Why Trust These Comparisons?

100% algorithmic: No human bias, no pay-for-ranking, no editorial interference. The data speaks for itself.

Open methodology: You can see exactly how scores are calculated and what data sources we use.

Real-time validation: Every metric is verifiable through GitHub, arXiv, Reddit, and other public sources.

Create Your Own Comparison

Compare any two AI companies from our database of 100+ tracked companies. Get instant access to real-time metrics, activity data, and marketing honesty scores.