Compare co:here vs The New York Times with real-time data on AI adoption, activity levels, community sentiment, and marketing honesty. This comparison analyzes 0 recent events including product launches, research papers, GitHub commits, and community discussions to show you which company is genuinely innovating versus just marketing. Our proprietary BS Detection algorithm reveals the gap between hype and reality, measuring how marketing claims align with actual product capabilities and user experiences. Rankings update every 5 minutes with verified data from arXiv, Reddit, tech news, and company blogs.
Quick Answer
The New York Times is 0.0x more active (0 vs 0 events), while co:here has better community sentiment (42% vs 30%). Choose The New York Times for cutting-edge features or co:here for reliability. co:here has more honest marketing (BS gap: 5.2 vs 7.8).
Head-to-Head Stats
| Metric | co:here | The New York Times |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #34 | #38 |
| Overall Score | 14089.5 | 12039.2 |
| 7-Day Events | 0 | 0 |
| 30-Day Events | 13 | 0 |
| Sentiment | 42% | 30% |
| Hype Score | 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Reality Score | 3.9 | 1.6 |
| BS Gap | +5.2 | +7.8 |
Key Insights
Activity Level
The New York Times is 0.0x more active (0 vs 0 events), which means The New York Times is likely releasing more features, updates, and innovations faster than co:here.
Community Sentiment
co:here has better community sentiment (42% vs 30%), indicating users are more satisfied and have fewer complaints about co:here's products.
Marketing Honesty
co:here has a lower BS gap (5.2 vs 7.8), meaning co:here's marketing claims are more aligned with actual product capabilities and user experiences.
Market Position
co:here ranks #34 vs The New York Times at #38, showing co:here has stronger overall market presence and adoption.
Related Comparisons
Compare these companies with other leaders in the AI industry
Want More Details?
View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis