Skip to main content

>Anthropic vs Stability AI

Anthropic AI Company Profile & RankingsStability AI AI Company Profile & Rankings

AI Activity Comparison

Anthropic

Anthropic PBC is an American artificial intelligence company based in San Francisco that researches and develops large language models. Founded in 2021 by former OpenAI members Daniela and Dario Amodei, the company focuses on building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems with an emphasis on safety research. Its primary achievement is the creation of Claude, a family of large language models. Anthropic has secured significant investments, including up to $4 billion from Amazon and $2 billion from Google.

Stability AI

Stability AI Ltd is a UK-based artificial intelligence company that develops open AI models, most notably the text-to-image model Stable Diffusion. The company was founded in 2019 and rose to prominence following the public release of Stable Diffusion in August 2022. A significant $101 million funding round was led by Coatue and Lightspeed Venture Partners. In 2024, the company underwent a leadership transition, appointing Prem Akkaraju, former CEO of Weta Digital, as its chief executive. The company has since secured additional investment from a consortium including Greycroft, Coatue Management, and Sound Ventures, with Sean Parker joining as Executive Chairman and filmmaker James Cameron joining its board of directors.

Data updated: • Live

Anthropic versus Stability AI: Live 2026 Comparison

Anthropic leads in development velocity with 415 events this week (138.3x more than Stability AI), while Stability AI holds the edge in community sentiment at 26% positive. This comparison draws on 418 tracked events from the past 7 days — including product launches, research papers, and community discussions — scored through our 5-dimension scoring methodology. Our Hype Gap analysis shows Stability AI has more authentic positioning (gap: -3.6) compared to Anthropic (4.6). Data refreshes every 5 minutes. Compare other AI companies →

Quick Answer

Anthropic is 138.3x more active (415 vs 3 events), while Stability AI has better community sentiment (26% vs 25%). Choose Anthropic for cutting-edge features or Stability AI for reliability. Stability AI has more honest marketing (hype gap: -3.6 vs 4.6).

Head-to-Head Stats

Comparison of key metrics between Anthropic and Stability AI
MetricAnthropicStability AI
Rank#2#86
Overall Score994.811.1
7-Day Events4153
30-Day Events7674
Sentiment25%26%
Momentum
7d vs 30d velocity
+29%0%
Hype Score8.14.7
Reality Score3.58.3
Hype Gap+4.6-3.6

📊 Visual Comparison

Compare 5 key metrics on a 0-100 scale. Larger area = stronger overall performance.

Anthropic
Stability AI
Activity
100vs2
Sentiment
25vs26
Score
995vs11
Momentum
50vs50
Confidence
0vs0

Metric Definitions:

Activity: Weekly GitHub events (max 200 = 100)
Sentiment: Community sentiment (0-100)
Score: Overall leaderboard score
Momentum: Rank movement trend (50 = neutral)
Confidence: Data confidence level (0-100)

Key Insights

Shipping Velocity

Anthropic logged 415 events this week vs Stability AI's 3 — a 138.3x difference in product launches, research papers, and code commits. Over the past 30 days, the gap is 191.8x (767 vs 4), suggesting this pace is consistent.

Community Sentiment

Stability AI has 26% positive sentiment vs Anthropic's 25%. The 2-point gap is modest, meaning both have comparable community trust.

Marketing Honesty

Stability AI's hype gap of -3.6 vs Anthropic's 4.6 means Stability AI delivers on its promises — marketing claims closely match actual capabilities.

Market Position

Anthropic at #2 outranks Stability AI at #86 among 2,800+ AI companies. The 84-rank gap reflects different market tiers and adoption levels.

Momentum Trend

Anthropic is accelerating (29% velocity growth) while Stability AI is flat — a diverging trend worth watching.

Want More Details?

View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis

>

Why Compare Anthropic vs Stability AI?

Cross-Tier Comparison

Comparing Anthropic (#2) with Stability AI (#86) reveals the 84-rank gap between different market tiers. Useful for understanding what separates top-tier from emerging players.

Who Compares These Companies

Enterprise Buyers

Comparing market leader against emerging alternative to balance stability vs innovation.

"Anthropic for enterprise-grade reliability, Stability AI for cutting-edge features."

Investors & Analysts

Tracking momentum, activity levels, and market sentiment to identify growth opportunities.

"Monitor Anthropic's higher activity for potential upside."

Key Differences

  • **Activity**: Anthropic shows 412 more events in 7 days, suggesting higher development velocity.
  • **Overall Performance**: 983.7-point score gap indicates Anthropic has stronger combined metrics across activity, sentiment, and execution.

Making Your Decision

Consider Anthropic if you value:

  • • Proven market leadership (#2)
  • • Higher development activity

Consider Stability AI if you value:

  • • Stronger community sentiment
  • • Higher substance-to-hype ratio
>

How Company Comparisons Work

Our comparison system analyzes real-time data across multiple dimensions to give you an objective, data-driven view of how companies stack up.

1

Real-Time Data Aggregation

We pull live data from 211 verified sources including GitHub commits, arXiv research papers, product launches, Reddit discussions, and tech news. Data refreshes every 5 minutes.

Activity metrics: Events (7d, 30d, all-time)
Community metrics: Sentiment analysis
Reality metrics: Hype vs substance
Market metrics: Rank, score, movement
2

Apples-to-Apples Scoring

Companies operate at different scales, so we normalize all metrics for fair comparison. Events are scored with time decay (recent events count more) and source diversity multipliers.

5 Dimensions: Innovation, Adoption, Market Impact, Media, Technical
Time Decay: Recent events weighted higher than older ones
Source Diversity: Multiple independent sources weighted higher
3

5-Dimension Scoring

Each event is classified across 5 dimensions, then aggregated with time decay and source diversity weighting.

Score = Σ[(Innovation × 25% + Adoption × 25% + Market Impact × 20% + Media × 15% + Technical × 15%) × Time Decay]
Innovation (25%): Product launches, breakthroughs, novel capabilities
Adoption (25%): User growth, integrations, developer ecosystem
Market Impact (20%): Funding, partnerships, acquisitions
Media Attention (15%): Press coverage, community discussion
Technical (15%): Research papers, benchmarks, open source
Sentiment and Hype/Reality are tracked separately as supplementary signals.
4

Visual Comparison

We present the data in multiple formats to help different decision-making styles:

  • Head-to-Head Table: Direct numeric comparison of all metrics
  • Radar Chart: Visual shape shows strengths and weaknesses
  • Key Insights: AI-generated narrative explaining what the numbers mean
  • Hype Detection: Marketing honesty comparison (over-promise vs over-deliver)
5

Always Current

Unlike static "best of" lists that get stale, our comparisons update every 5 minutes. When a company ships a major release or gets negative sentiment, you'll see it reflected immediately.

Why Trust These Comparisons?

100% algorithmic: No human bias, no pay-for-ranking, no editorial interference. The data speaks for itself.

Open methodology: You can see exactly how scores are calculated and what data sources we use.

Real-time validation: Every metric is verifiable through GitHub, arXiv, Reddit, and other public sources.

Create Your Own Comparison

Compare any two AI companies from our database of 500+ tracked companies. Get instant access to real-time metrics, activity data, and marketing honesty scores.