>Anthropic vs Goldman Sachs
Anthropic AI Company Profile & Rankings • Goldman Sachs AI Company Profile & Rankings
AI Activity Comparison
Anthropic
Anthropic PBC is an American artificial intelligence company based in San Francisco that researches and develops large language models. Founded in 2021 by former OpenAI members Daniela and Dario Amodei, the company focuses on building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems with an emphasis on safety research. Its primary achievement is the creation of Claude, a family of large language models. Anthropic has secured significant investments, including up to $4 billion from Amazon and $2 billion from Google.
Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company. Founded in 1869 and headquartered in New York City, it is one of the world's largest investment banks by revenue. The firm offers a comprehensive suite of services including investment banking, securities underwriting, prime brokerage, asset and wealth management. It operates as a market maker, provides clearing services, and manages private-equity and hedge funds. Through Goldman Sachs Bank USA, it also functions as a direct bank. The company is considered a systemically important financial institution. Recent news has involved the transfer of its Apple credit card portfolio and research on energy infrastructure.
Anthropic versus Goldman Sachs: Live 2026 Comparison
Based on real-time data, Anthropic outperforms Goldman Sachs across both activity (266 vs 4 events this week) and community sentiment (29% vs 23%). This comparison draws on 270 tracked events from the past 7 days — including product launches, research papers, and community discussions — scored through our 5-dimension scoring methodology. Our Hype Gap analysis shows Anthropic has more authentic positioning (gap: 4.6) compared to Goldman Sachs (8.7). Data refreshes every 5 minutes. Compare other AI companies →
Quick Answer
Anthropic is significantly better than Goldman Sachs on both activity (266 vs 4 events) and community sentiment (29% vs 23%), making it the stronger and more reliable choice for most users. Anthropic has more honest marketing (hype gap: 4.6 vs 8.7).
Head-to-Head Stats
| Metric | Anthropic | Goldman Sachs |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #2 | #35 |
| Overall Score | 916.6 | 31.0 |
| 7-Day Events | 266 | 4 |
| 30-Day Events | 601 | 11 |
| Sentiment | 29% | 23% |
| Momentum 7d vs 30d velocity | +29% | 0% |
| Hype Score | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Reality Score | 3.5 | 0.1 |
| Hype Gap | +4.6 | +8.7 |
📊 Visual Comparison
Compare 5 key metrics on a 0-100 scale. Larger area = stronger overall performance.
Metric Definitions:
Key Insights
Shipping Velocity
Anthropic logged 266 events this week vs Goldman Sachs's 4 — a 66.5x difference in product launches, research papers, and code commits. Over the past 30 days, the gap is 54.6x (601 vs 11), suggesting this gap is widening.
Community Sentiment
Anthropic has 29% positive sentiment vs Goldman Sachs's 23%. The 6-point gap is modest, meaning both have comparable community trust.
Marketing Honesty
Anthropic's hype gap of 4.6 vs Goldman Sachs's 8.7 means Anthropic delivers on its promises — marketing claims closely match actual capabilities.
Market Position
Anthropic at #2 outranks Goldman Sachs at #35 among 2,800+ AI companies. The 33-rank gap reflects different market tiers and adoption levels.
Momentum Trend
Anthropic is accelerating (29% velocity growth) while Goldman Sachs is flat — a diverging trend worth watching.
Related Comparisons
Compare these companies with other leaders in the AI industry
Related AI Company Comparisons
Compare these companies with other AI leaders:
Anthropic Comparisons
Goldman Sachs Comparisons
Explore more comparisons:
Want More Details?
View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis
Why Compare Anthropic vs Goldman Sachs?
Leader vs Challenger
Anthropic (#2) has established market position, while Goldman Sachs (#35) is 33 ranks behind. This comparison shows the gap between market leaders and aspiring competitors.
Who Compares These Companies
Enterprise Buyers
Comparing market leader against emerging alternative to balance stability vs innovation.
"Anthropic for enterprise-grade reliability, Goldman Sachs for cutting-edge features."
Investors & Analysts
Tracking momentum, activity levels, and market sentiment to identify growth opportunities.
"Monitor Anthropic's higher activity for potential upside."
Key Differences
- **Activity**: Anthropic shows 262 more events in 7 days, suggesting higher development velocity.
- **Overall Performance**: 885.6-point score gap indicates Anthropic has stronger combined metrics across activity, sentiment, and execution.
Making Your Decision
Consider Anthropic if you value:
- • Proven market leadership (#2)
- • Higher development activity
- • Stronger community sentiment
- • Higher substance-to-hype ratio
Consider Goldman Sachs if you value:
How Company Comparisons Work
Our comparison system analyzes real-time data across multiple dimensions to give you an objective, data-driven view of how companies stack up.
Real-Time Data Aggregation
We pull live data from 211 verified sources including GitHub commits, arXiv research papers, product launches, Reddit discussions, and tech news. Data refreshes every 5 minutes.
Apples-to-Apples Scoring
Companies operate at different scales, so we normalize all metrics for fair comparison. Events are scored with time decay (recent events count more) and source diversity multipliers.
5-Dimension Scoring
Each event is classified across 5 dimensions, then aggregated with time decay and source diversity weighting.
Visual Comparison
We present the data in multiple formats to help different decision-making styles:
- ✓Head-to-Head Table: Direct numeric comparison of all metrics
- ✓Radar Chart: Visual shape shows strengths and weaknesses
- ✓Key Insights: AI-generated narrative explaining what the numbers mean
- ✓Hype Detection: Marketing honesty comparison (over-promise vs over-deliver)
Always Current
Unlike static "best of" lists that get stale, our comparisons update every 5 minutes. When a company ships a major release or gets negative sentiment, you'll see it reflected immediately.
Why Trust These Comparisons?
100% algorithmic: No human bias, no pay-for-ranking, no editorial interference. The data speaks for itself.
Open methodology: You can see exactly how scores are calculated and what data sources we use.
Real-time validation: Every metric is verifiable through GitHub, arXiv, Reddit, and other public sources.
Create Your Own Comparison
Compare any two AI companies from our database of 500+ tracked companies. Get instant access to real-time metrics, activity data, and marketing honesty scores.