>Anthropic vs Figure AI
Anthropic AI Company Profile & Rankings • Figure AI AI Company Profile & Rankings
AI Activity Comparison
Anthropic
Anthropic PBC is an American artificial intelligence company based in San Francisco that researches and develops large language models. Founded in 2021 by former OpenAI members Daniela and Dario Amodei, the company focuses on building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems with an emphasis on safety research. Its primary achievement is the creation of Claude, a family of large language models. Anthropic has secured significant investments, including up to $4 billion from Amazon and $2 billion from Google.
Figure AI
Figure AI, Inc. is an American robotics company that develops artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots for commercial applications. Founded in 2022 by entrepreneur Brett Adcock, the company introduced its bipedal Figure 01 prototype for logistics and warehousing tasks. A significant partnership was announced with BMW in January 2024 to deploy its robots in automotive manufacturing. The company secured $675 million in a February 2024 funding round from investors including Jeff Bezos, Microsoft, Nvidia, and OpenAI's startup fund, achieving a $2.6 billion valuation. That same month, it announced a collaboration with OpenAI to develop specialized AI models for robot reasoning, though this partnership ended in 2025. In February 2025, the company announced its next-generation humanoid robot, Helix.
Anthropic versus Figure AI: Live 2026 Comparison
Based on real-time data, Anthropic outperforms Figure AI across both activity (250 vs 1 events this week) and community sentiment (30% vs -20%). This comparison draws on 251 tracked events from the past 7 days — including product launches, research papers, and community discussions — scored through our 5-dimension scoring methodology. Our Hype Gap analysis shows Figure AI has more authentic positioning (gap: -21.0) compared to Anthropic (4.6). Data refreshes every 5 minutes. Compare other AI companies →
Quick Answer
Anthropic is significantly better than Figure AI on both activity (250 vs 1 events) and community sentiment (30% vs -20%), making it the stronger and more reliable choice for most users. Figure AI has more honest marketing (hype gap: -21.0 vs 4.6).
Head-to-Head Stats
📊 Visual Comparison
Compare 5 key metrics on a 0-100 scale. Larger area = stronger overall performance.
Metric Definitions:
Key Insights
Shipping Velocity
Anthropic logged 250 events this week vs Figure AI's 1 — a 250.0x difference in product launches, research papers, and code commits. Over the past 30 days, the gap is 574.0x (574 vs 1), suggesting this pace is consistent.
Community Sentiment
Anthropic has 30% positive sentiment vs Figure AI's -20%. That 50-point gap is significant — it signals stronger user satisfaction and fewer community complaints about Anthropic.
Marketing Honesty
Figure AI's hype gap of -21.0 vs Anthropic's 4.6 means Figure AI delivers on its promises — marketing claims closely match actual capabilities.
Market Position
Anthropic at #2 outranks Figure AI at #177 among 2,800+ AI companies. The 175-rank gap reflects different market tiers and adoption levels.
Momentum Trend
Anthropic is accelerating (29% velocity growth) while Figure AI is flat — a diverging trend worth watching.
Related Comparisons
Compare these companies with other leaders in the AI industry
Related AI Company Comparisons
Compare these companies with other AI leaders:
Anthropic Comparisons
Figure AI Comparisons
Explore more comparisons:
Want More Details?
View full company profiles with event history and trend analysis
Why Compare Anthropic vs Figure AI?
Cross-Tier Comparison
Comparing Anthropic (#2) with Figure AI (#177) reveals the 175-rank gap between different market tiers. Useful for understanding what separates top-tier from emerging players.
Who Compares These Companies
Enterprise Buyers
Comparing market leader against emerging alternative to balance stability vs innovation.
"Anthropic for enterprise-grade reliability, Figure AI for cutting-edge features."
Investors & Analysts
Tracking momentum, activity levels, and market sentiment to identify growth opportunities.
"Monitor Anthropic's higher activity for potential upside."
Key Differences
- **Activity**: Anthropic shows 249 more events in 7 days, suggesting higher development velocity.
- **Community Perception**: Anthropic has notably stronger positive sentiment (50% higher).
- **Substance**: Figure AI demonstrates higher reality-to-hype ratio, delivering more than they promise.
- **Overall Performance**: 878.9-point score gap indicates Anthropic has stronger combined metrics across activity, sentiment, and execution.
Making Your Decision
Consider Anthropic if you value:
- • Proven market leadership (#2)
- • Higher development activity
- • Stronger community sentiment
Consider Figure AI if you value:
- • Higher substance-to-hype ratio
How Company Comparisons Work
Our comparison system analyzes real-time data across multiple dimensions to give you an objective, data-driven view of how companies stack up.
Real-Time Data Aggregation
We pull live data from 211 verified sources including GitHub commits, arXiv research papers, product launches, Reddit discussions, and tech news. Data refreshes every 5 minutes.
Apples-to-Apples Scoring
Companies operate at different scales, so we normalize all metrics for fair comparison. Events are scored with time decay (recent events count more) and source diversity multipliers.
5-Dimension Scoring
Each event is classified across 5 dimensions, then aggregated with time decay and source diversity weighting.
Visual Comparison
We present the data in multiple formats to help different decision-making styles:
- ✓Head-to-Head Table: Direct numeric comparison of all metrics
- ✓Radar Chart: Visual shape shows strengths and weaknesses
- ✓Key Insights: AI-generated narrative explaining what the numbers mean
- ✓Hype Detection: Marketing honesty comparison (over-promise vs over-deliver)
Always Current
Unlike static "best of" lists that get stale, our comparisons update every 5 minutes. When a company ships a major release or gets negative sentiment, you'll see it reflected immediately.
Why Trust These Comparisons?
100% algorithmic: No human bias, no pay-for-ranking, no editorial interference. The data speaks for itself.
Open methodology: You can see exactly how scores are calculated and what data sources we use.
Real-time validation: Every metric is verifiable through GitHub, arXiv, Reddit, and other public sources.
Create Your Own Comparison
Compare any two AI companies from our database of 500+ tracked companies. Get instant access to real-time metrics, activity data, and marketing honesty scores.